igc is Leading in M&A upper mid-cap in the Leaders League 2027 ranking

Reading time
13 minutes
Date
Oct 9, 2026
Author
Murilo Oliveira — Partner, igc Partners
igc won the Leading tier, the highest, in the Leaders League 2027 ranking of independent M&A advisors. Understand what the research recognizes and what it represents for those about to sell.

Key takeaways from this article

‍

  • igc is in the Leading tier, the highest in the Brazilian Leaders League 2027 ranking for independent M&A advisors in the upper mid-cap segment, in a select group of five firms among about thirty evaluated.
  • Leaders League is an international research house based in Paris, and its classification results from a rigorous four-month cycle that combines documentary submission, client feedback, peer review and the reading of qualified third parties in the market.
  • The source with the greatest weight is client feedback, collected by Leaders League on behalf of the research itself and never on behalf of the firm under evaluation, which makes the assessment spontaneous and hard to influence.
  • The recognition is twofold: igc is also in the Leading tier in Debt Capital Markets, which places the firm at the top both in sell-side advisory and in debt structuring.
  • The position in the Leaders League adds to igc's leadership in the Mergermarket ranking by number of transactions, combining qualitative recognition and proven volume in a single firm.

‍

The problem: choosing the advisor is the first decision of the sale

‍

The entrepreneur who decides to sell the company almost always does so only once in a lifetime. On the other side of the table is a buyer that acquires companies frequently, with an investment committee, a due diligence model and lawyers who have already seen every clause. The asymmetry is real, and it begins before the negotiation: it begins with the choice of who will conduct the process.

This choice defines a good part of the outcome. It is the advisor who builds the competition between buyers, who decides to whom the company will be presented, who sustains the price when due diligence tightens and who negotiates the terms that determine how much of the headline value actually reaches the seller's account. A good advisor does not add a detail to the process. They change the entire process.

That is why independent market research exists. It answers, with method and a verifiable source, the question the entrepreneur alone would have no way of answering: which firms the market and, above all, the clients themselves consider the best in each segment. That is exactly the work of Leaders League, and it is there that igc reached the Leading tier in the 2027 edition.

‍

The solution: research that listens to those who have already hired

‍

Leaders League is a research house based in Paris that maps and classifies professional service providers in dozens of countries, among them law firms, audit firms, investment banks and independent financial advisors. Its lists are followed by investors, by the legal and finance departments of large companies and by the specialized press.

What distinguishes this research is the depth of the process. The classification is neither bought nor self-declared: it is determined over a cycle of approximately four months, three of data collection and one of processing and defining the tiers.

‍

The four sources that support the classification

‍

  1. The firm's documentary submission. A detailed form covers the performance of the last twelve months in the area evaluated: the ten main transactions of the period, the composition of the team between partners and associates, the differentiation relative to the market, the client base and new business, team changes and a list of reference clients with contact. There is also a confidential interview with the editor responsible for the ranking.
  2. Direct client feedback. It is the source with the greatest weight. Leaders League maintains its own base of executives and chief financial officers and adds to it the references indicated by the firms. The contact is made on behalf of the research itself, never on behalf of the firm under evaluation, precisely so that the assessment is spontaneous and the client feels free both to praise and to criticize. No firm can influence this stage.
  3. Peer review. Firms comment on and recommend competitors, both in the form and in the interviews. The methodology recognizes the bias of this type of assessment and weights it in the whole, which reinforces the rigor of the method.
  4. The reading of qualified third parties. Since Leaders League evaluates different categories of providers simultaneously, it cross-references perceptions between them. When researching M&A advisory, it considers the view of ecosystem participants who are neither clients nor competitors of the firm under evaluation, which broadens the validity of the result.

Four declared criteria apply to these sources: the nature, complexity, size, volume, innovation and quality of the transactions conducted; the recognition and reputation of the firm among clients, peers and third parties; the size and expansion of the team, with the track record of those who conduct the client relationship; and the prestige, diversity and internationalization of the client base.

‍

The recognition tiers and where igc stands

‍

Leaders League organizes the firms of each ranking into five tiers of recognition. Leading is the highest, reserved for firms that stand out simultaneously in quality of transactions, reputation, team and client base. Below Leading, where igc stands, the ladder continues with Excellent, high-level performance just below the top; Highly recommended, a consolidated and well-regarded practice in the market; Recommended, a significant presence in the segment; and Valuable practice, performance recognized by the research.

In the 2027 edition of the Brazilian ranking of independent advisors in M&A upper mid-cap, published on October 6, 2026, about thirty firms were evaluated and distributed across these five tiers. Only five reached the Leading tier, and igc is one of them. Within each tier, the firms are listed in alphabetical order, with no internal hierarchy.

‍

A recognition that repeats on another front

‍

The same research classifies igc in the Leading tier also in Capital Markets, in the Debt Capital Markets subarea, which corresponds to the firm's Capital Solutions area. Being at the top of both lists means the entrepreneur finds, under the same structure, first-rate advisory both to sell the company and to capitalize it.

This qualitative recognition adds to another, of a quantitative nature. In the Mergermarket ranking, which counts transactions actually completed, igc leads in number of operations. They are two different lenses on the same market, and the firm is at the top of both.

Nature. Mergermarket is quantitative, from an international transaction database; Leaders League is qualitative, from primary market research.

What it measures. Mergermarket counts transactions actually completed, not announcements or mandates; Leaders League measures the perception of clients, peers and third parties about the last twelve months.

What it demonstrates. Mergermarket shows how often the firm takes processes through to closing; Leaders League, how those who have already hired assess the experience.

igc's position. In Mergermarket, leadership in number of transactions; in Leaders League, the Leading tier in M&A upper mid-cap and in corporate debt.

‍

Best practices and common mistakes when choosing an M&A advisor

‍

Independent research such as Leaders League's is the best tool available to begin this choice. A few precautions help extract everything it offers.

‍

Best practices:

  • Prioritize rankings with a published methodology, which disclose source, period and criteria, as Leaders League does.
  • Give weight to research that listens to clients, because the experience of those who have already hired is the indicator closest to what the entrepreneur will live through.
  • Look for the category corresponding to the company's size, since upper mid-cap, lower mid-cap and large cap have distinct buyers and dynamics.
  • Cross-reference qualitative recognition with proven volume, combining a perception survey with a ranking of completed transactions.
  • Check the firm's sector specialization, which determines to whom the company will be presented and with what depth of argument.
  • Ask who conducts the process day to day and confirm that this person will remain until closing.
  • Assess the real access to buyers, understanding how the list is built and how the approach is made, including abroad.

‍

Common mistakes:

  • Deciding by an isolated referral, without checking how the market and clients assess the firm.
  • Considering only the best-known name, without checking the list corresponding to the company's size.
  • Confusing lists of different universes, such as independent advisors and investment banks, which fulfill distinct roles in the market.
  • Accepting a promise of a multiple at the very first meeting, before the competitive process and due diligence.
  • Ignoring who signs the mandate and who will actually be at the table over the following months.
  • Starting the process under cash pressure, when a prior debt structuring would put the seller in a much better position.

‍

Practical examples: what the work of a Leading firm delivers

‍

Example 1: the competition that sets the price

A mid-sized family manufacturer receives an informal approach from a competitor and considers negotiating directly. Conducted as a structured process, the same operation comes to involve several qualified interested parties advancing in parallel.

The difference is of nature, not of degree. With a single buyer, there is a conversation. With several, there is a market, and it is the market that sets the price. Sustaining this simultaneity, including in the face of requests for early exclusivity, is one of the competencies that the client assessment captures.

‍

Example 2: the buyer that was not on the radar

A services company starts from the hypothesis that its natural buyers are the three national competitors in the sector. The mapping reveals a foreign group looking to enter Brazil, willing to pay for market access and not only for the company's results.

Reaching this buyer requires a mapped base and active international relationships. At igc, there are more than 6,000 potential buyers in Brazil and abroad, and more than 50% of transactions involve foreign buyers, with the support of the Miami operation.

‍

Example 3: the same partner from start to finish

A sale process takes several months between the decision and the closing, and due diligence is usually the most sensitive phase. Keeping the same interlocutor throughout this entire period preserves the understanding of the business at the moment it matters most, and avoids the loss of momentum that a change of team causes.

At igc, the partner who opens the process is the same one who closes it. The 35 partners are owners of the firm, and the conversation with the entrepreneur takes place from owner to owner, between people who carry the same type of risk.

‍

Frequently asked questions

‍

The examples show what first-rate work delivers over the course of a process. Below, direct answers to the most common questions about the ranking and about choosing the advisor.

‍

What is igc's classification in the Leaders League ranking?

In the 2027 edition of the Brazilian ranking of independent M&A advisors in the upper mid-cap segment, published on October 6, 2026, igc is in the Leading tier, the highest on the list, in a group of five firms among about thirty evaluated.

‍

What does the Leading tier mean?

It is the maximum level of recognition awarded by Leaders League in a ranking, reserved for firms that stand out simultaneously in quality of transactions, market reputation, team composition and client-base profile. Below it come Excellent, Highly recommended, Recommended and Valuable practice.

‍

What is Leaders League?

It is an international research house based in Paris that classifies professional service providers by country and area of activity. Its lists are followed by investors, by executives of large companies and by the specialized press as a market reference.

‍

How does Leaders League arrive at the classification?

Through a research cycle of approximately four months that combines four sources: the firms' documentary submission, the feedback of clients contacted on behalf of the research itself, peer review and the reading of qualified third parties in the ecosystem. The classification results from cross-referencing these sources.

‍

Can a firm influence the result?

The firm takes part only in the submission stage, presenting its transactions and its team. The other sources are collected independently by Leaders League, including client feedback, which is obtained on behalf of the research and not of the firm under evaluation.

‍

Is this ranking the same as Mergermarket's?

They are complementary. Mergermarket counts transactions actually completed in a period and a region, and in it igc leads in number of operations. Leaders League measures market perception through primary research, with emphasis on client feedback. igc is at the top of both.

‍

Does the ranking include investment banks?

This is the ranking of independent advisors. Leaders League publishes separate lists for investment banks, which fulfill distinct roles in the market and are frequently buyers and counterparties in M&A operations.

‍

What is the upper mid-cap segment in M&A?

It is the upper band of the mid-sized market: companies with enough scale to attract significant strategic buyers and private equity funds, but which generally remain under family or founder control. It is the segment in which igc concentrates its sell-side activity.

‍

In what other categories is igc recognized?

Also in Capital Markets, in the Debt Capital Markets subarea, likewise in the Leading tier. It is the front of corporate debt structuring and fundraising, which at the firm corresponds to the Capital Solutions area.

‍

Conclusion: recognition built company by company

‍

The Leading tier in the Leaders League 2027 is not a title declared by the firm. It is the result of independent research that listened to clients, peers and market third parties over four months, and that placed igc in the top group of the segment it chose to work in from day one. For the entrepreneur evaluating whether to sell the company, it is the confirmation, coming from outside, of something only those who have already been through the process could attest to.

igc Partners is the largest M&A firm in Latin America, with exclusively sell-side activity since 1997 and more than 550 completed transactions. The firm operates as ten sector boutiques within a single structure, in Agribusiness, Business Services, Consumer, Retail & Education, Industrials, IT & Professional Services, Chemicals, Real Estate, Healthcare, Financial Services and Tech, with partners, associates and analysts dedicated to each sector and the support of scale and global reach. More than 50% of transactions involve foreign buyers, with direct access to more than 6,000 potential buyers in Brazil and abroad.

There are 35 partners, all owners of the firm, personally conducting each process from owner to owner. The partner who opens the transaction is the same one who closes it, because there is nowhere else to go. It is this model that Mergermarket measures in volume and that Leaders League recognizes in quality.

The entrepreneur can start this conversation even before deciding to sell. An early diagnosis helps to understand how much the company is worth today, what can be done to increase that value and when the right moment is to open a process.

‍

Learn more